SCHOLARS WEIGH MY RESEARCH

 

by Dave MacPherson

 

(For more than 30 years my pretrib critics have falsely claimed that  leading scholars condemn my research. Since those critics are in effect  slamming poor, helpless, long-departed Margaret Macdonald, I hereby come to  her defense with a few of the many reactions from scholars who generally  haven't had a huge axe to grind either for or against the pretrib rapture  view. My usual practice, by the way, has been to obtain permission when  quoting personal letters.)

 

Loraine Boettner (theologian, author): "I think that you have done a  magnificent job in showing the real origin of the Pre-trib rapture theory."

F. F. Bruce (theologian, encyclopedia contributor): "It is strange  that Darby should acknowledge his indebtedness to a young lady in Limerick  and say nothing about the young lady in Port Glasgow [that is, not  acknowledge her pre-Antichrist rapture of part of the church]....If this  work of yours can do anything to counter the influence of Hal Lindsey...,  you will have rendered a signal service." Superficial----and even  devious----scholarship loves to repeat Bruce's 1975 surmise that pretrib  was "in the air in the 1820s and 1830s." Hired critic Thomas Ice knows that  this wasn't a scientific conclusion (does reliable data rest literally "in  the air"?), and Ice moreover has ignored Bruce's later statements  complimenting my evidence!

Gary DeMar (theologian, author): "THE RAPTURE PLOT is the  never-before-told, true story of the plot----how plagiarism and subtle  document changes created the 'mother of all revisionisms.' A fascinating  piece of detective work."

Robert H. Gundry (theologian, author): "As usual, Dave MacPherson  overwhelms his critics with a superior knowledge of the primary sources.  His is a rare combination of historical research and investigative  reporting. Those who would refute him have failed to outhustle him,  especially in the tracking down of information uncatalogued in academic  libraries." Superficial scholarship is aware that the  first----1973----printing of Gundry's THE CHURCH AND THE TRIBULATION stated  on pp. 185, 187: "The likelihood is that Edward Irving was the first to  suggest the pretribulational rapture....the outpouring on Margaret  Macdonald did not include revelation of a pretribulational rapture...." But  careful scholarship has long known that after Gundry saw my Macdonald  findings, he deleted his Irving statement and substituted favorable  comments about the Scottish lassie----changes appearing in his classic work  since the 1980's!

John H. Kromminga (Calvin Sem. president emeritus): "The material  appears to be well researched, and this impression is confirmed by the  excellent comments you cite from well-established evangelical  commentators."

Harold Lindsell (church historian, author): "...must reading for  anyone who is interested in the [pretrib] origins...."

C. S. Lovett (pastor, author): "You have to be, in my opinion, the  world's authority on Margaret."

Peter Marshall (pastor, author): "I am in emphatic agreement with you  on your thesis."

Walter Martin (researcher, author): "[MacPherson has produced] a  fascinating historical detective story...with surprising and not easily  refutable conclusions."

J. Gordon Melton (editor): "According to the best scholarship  available, the pretribulation, premillennial eschatology originated among  members of the Catholic Apostolic Church as a result of a vision and  revelation to Margaret MacDonald. See Dave MacPherson, THE UNBELIEVABLE  PRE-TRIB ORIGIN." (ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AMERICAN RELIGIONS, 1978)

Gary North (author, church historian): "...Dave MacPherson has  inflicted a deep wound on the pre-trib camp by showing that a teenage  Scottish girl named Margaret Macdonald...came up with this doctrine...." 

(Dispensationalism in Transition, Nov., 1988)

Harold J. Ockenga (theologian, author): "You have done your research  well."

J. I. Packer (author, church historian): "From my own explorations of  the origins of Darbyism I judge that you are presenting facts fairly, and I  am glad you are, for I also regard dispensationalism as an unhappy  aberration."

J. Barton Payne (theologian, author): "MacPherson has once and for all  overthrown Ernest Sandeen's assertions that the Irvingites never 'advocated  any doctrine resembling the secret rapture' and that to connect J. N. Darby  and early dispensationalism with Irving's church is 'a groundless and  pernicious charge'....For serious students of the history of  dispensationalism the study of MacPherson's discoveries has become a must." 

(Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Winter, 1974)

The Prairie Overcomer (Canada): "...MacPherson's case seems to be  watertight." (July, 1974)

Reformed Review: "MacPherson has done excellent historical research." 

(Spring, 1985)

Ian S. Rennie (author, church historian): "...it is likely that  [Margaret's revelation] was grist for Darby's mill." (DREAMS, VISIONS AND  ORACLES, 1977)

R. J. Rushdoony (theologian, author): "Dave MacPherson has been  responsible for major change in the eschatology of evangelical churches by  his devastating studies of some of the central aspects thereof. In THE  RAPTURE PLOT MacPherson tells us of the strange tale of 'rapture' writings,  revisions, cover-ups, altercations, and confusions. No one has equalled  MacPherson in his research on the 'pre-trib rapture.' Attempts to discredit  his research have failed...."

The Seminary Review: "[MacPherson] shows conclusively that Margaret  Macdonald was the originator of the concept." (June, 1984)

Oswald J. Smith (pastor, author): "You have some excellent thoughts  here that will be difficult to answer."

Merrill C. Tenney (theologian, author): "...the connection between  Margaret Macdonald and Irvingites and Brethren is reasonably well  established. You have done a valuable piece of research."

The Witness (oldest & largest Darbyist Brethren magazine in England):  "What [MacPherson] succeeds in establishing is that the [pretrib] view  outlined was first stated by a certain Margaret Macdonald...early in 1830." 

(April, 1974)

 

(The critics who have tried to cover up the above scholarship are  basically the ones who've tried to muddy the waters by "discovering" hints  of pretrib before 1830. For more on this, see my internet article entitled  "Deceiving, And Being Deceived.")